tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20337798.post6049952883985788712..comments2024-01-29T10:40:21.866+01:00Comments on agile aspects: Theoretically Agile is quite simple - as long as the theory is Theory YMichael Mahlberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17228297952885873743noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20337798.post-11588134165194023092013-09-03T14:51:06.888+02:002013-09-03T14:51:06.888+02:00Hello Kurt,
that's an interesting point of vie...Hello Kurt,<br />that's an interesting point of view. But I think that there actually has to be a kind of existing "Theory Y seed" that can be grown – without that seed all the agile mechanisms won't actually get traction. And especially if an organization is in a "Theory Y" state the power of a lot of agile "tools" can be leveraged efficiently - but of course YMMV. <br /><br />Cheers<br /> MichaelMichael Mahlberghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17228297952885873743noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20337798.post-61273755760120325902013-08-29T20:17:19.623+02:002013-08-29T20:17:19.623+02:00I always thought of "agile" as a bunch o...I always thought of "agile" as a bunch of mechanisms to help shift from a theory X to theory Y style of management.<br /><br />I would say a company that is already theory Y doesn't need it, so it is mostly something for theory X orgs.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16620075597235002901noreply@blogger.com