Of course there are a lot of situations and places where agile approaches have become the default mode, and looking back at the history of software development with regard to iteratively-incemental approaches that is only a re-discovery anyway.
But in the big – a.k.a. Enterprise-Level – companies it’s mostly not the case. Or only in name but not in action.
Sometimes even “The Enterprise” goes into “agile”-mode
There is a situation when even Enterprise-Level software projects switch to an agile mindset. At least in most things but the name.
All of a sudden certain things start to happen:
- Business people re-prioritize on a regular basis (in short intervals even)
- Business people take the time to describe and verify the requirements
- Rollouts are allowed with very little overhead (sometomes called ‘hot-fixes’ in this context)
- Developers ask the people from whom the requirements actually came, what they want now
The situation I’m referring to is especially common for in-house-software that is developed for (and often in) large comapnies. Not all – only those projects that come into a crisis-mode phase at the end of the development phase.
I mean the time between the official end of the project and the time the software is actually in use. After the project has been declared finished, but before it is adopted for company wide use. When the last glitches are eliminated – which often takes up way more time than ‘planned’.
This crisis-mode is actually when everybody switches to things that work. And surprisingly these things are an interesting subset of what the agile manifesto mandates. (Of course I’m referring to the second page here)
Unfortunately some practices are not so important in crisis mode. Things like “sustainable pace” and “regular reflections” sometimes don’t seem so important in crisis-mode, but even the “continuous attention to technical excellence” is often more prevalent in crises-mode than in the day-to-day business during the run-time of the project.
So, here‘s an idea: If your enterprise shows the same crisis-mode behaviours, why not use this as a wedge to introduce more agile approaches?
’till next time